Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dan Steiny's avatar

Hey, hey, Rob!

One thing that stands out to me across all four forces is how quickly content licensing is shifting from optional to infrastructural.

Bot blocking, competitive hedging, multimodal demand, and legal pressure are all pointing to the same underlying reality. Access to content is no longer a growth accelerator. It is a prerequisite for staying in the game.

What also feels different this time is who holds the leverage. It is not just the biggest publishers. It is the ones with rights clarity, provenance, and content that is actually usable across training, retrieval, and multimodal workflows. In that sense, the court cases almost matter less than the operational readiness of the content owners themselves.

It feels like we are moving into a phase where AI companies will care less about scraping more and more data and more about securing fewer, cleaner, defensible inputs. That changes how deals get done and who wins them.

Curious if you are seeing early signals of AI companies prioritizing content that is not just licensable, but structurally prepared for different model types and use cases. That feels like the next layer of differentiation.

Keep up the great Media and Machine research!

Dan

No posts

Ready for more?